Some people don't like to debate theology. I think that is unfortunate. If that is you then don't read this post. I think theology is important and should be debated.
So often those who hold to an
Armenian understanding of Scripture will point to evangelism and simply say, "why should we evangelise if God predestined?" This is a question of ignorance as the answer is simple and biblical. That said I must propose a similar question to those who hold a classical
Armenian perspective. Why pray?
If we are going to claim that man has a libertarian free will then how can we expect God to intervene? If God intervenes and changes a persons mind then that person's free will no longer exists.
This creates further problems. If God "foreknows" everything especially a person's decision regarding salvation and then you pray and God intervenes and the friend changes his mind and accepts the free gift of salvation what did God foreknow? Did God foreknow that you would pray? If He did then did you really have a choice in the matter? If you are just so convincing in your presentation of the gospel that convince that person to accept Christ then how could God have known that that person would accept Christ? If that person has libertarian free will then they could have chosen to reject Christ just as easily. If that is the case then how could God foreknow?
It seems to me the
Arminian must make a decision to believe that God did not foreknow, at least in the sense classic
Arminianism suggests or they must come to a different understanding of free will and predestination.